First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 4612 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Youaraj Rai vs Chander Bahadur Karki
[LexDoc Id : 305786]
|
SC |
2006 |
Triveni Chemicals Ltd. vs UOI and Anr.
Unjust enrichment-Amendment of s.11B of Central Excise Act 1944-The amendment made to s.11B of the Central Excise Act 1944 requiring the applicant claiming refund to prove that the incidence of duty had been borne [LexDoc Id : 305785]
|
SC |
2006 |
M.R. Kudva vs State of Andhra Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 305784]
|
SC |
2006 |
Kamla Devi vs Khushal Kanwar and Anr
[LexDoc Id : 305783]
|
SC |
2006 |
Acharaparambath Pradeepan and Anr. vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 305779]
|
SC |
2006 |
Central Bureau of Investigation vs Tuncay Alankus
[LexDoc Id : 454422]
|
SC |
2006 |
CIT vs K. Bhuvanendran and Ors.
Block assessment: No evidence found-Retraction of statement made under s.132(4)-AY 1997-98. During the search under s. 132, the assessee had admitted payment of Rs.23 lakhs over and above the amount of sale disclosed in the sale d [LexDoc Id : 346569]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
CIT vs Akhilesh Chandra Agrawal
Penalty: Failure to get accounts audited-Belated filing of audit report-AY 1991-92. Law applicable. The assessee got its account within the prescribed time, but filed the Audit report late with the return on 21 Dece [LexDoc Id : 343135]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2006 |
Thermax Ltd. vs DCWT
Valuation of cars-Fair market value-The Fair Market value of motor cars could be reasonably determined at 80 percent of their insurance value and not their Written down value as per Inco [LexDoc Id : 333447]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2006 |
Rafiqa and Ors. vs Habibullah Bhat and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 332604]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2006 |
Bhartia Associates (P) Ltd. vs State of Assam and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 332575]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2006 |
Superintendent of Post Offices and Ors. vs R. Valisina Babu
[LexDoc Id : 330741]
|
SC |
2006 |
Oswal Agro Furane Ltd. (In Liquidation), In re
Winding up-Disbursement of claims-Disbursement of claims of 33 employees of a company-in-liquidation was held to be illegal, unjustified and without jurisdiction since the said disburs [LexDoc Id : 328307]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
CIT vs Pramod Kumar Maheshwari
Penalty: Concealment of income-Surrender of income by assessees father-AY 1990-91. During the search under s.132, at assessee's premises certain income was surrendered by his father. The said amount was added to his inco [LexDoc Id : 327730]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2006 |
CIT vs Deepchand Naresh Chand
Guest house expenses-Rent paid on guest house-AY 1986-87. The rent paid on guest house was disalllowable under s.37(4). S.30 was not applicable in respect of guest house expenses.
S.37(4) [LexDoc Id : 327150]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2006 |
CIT vs Vijay Kumar Bhasin, Shakti Property Dealers
Penalty: Concealment of income-Surrender of income subject to no penalty-AY 1985-86, 1986-87. The assessee had surrendered certain income under s.132(4) of the Income Tax Act 1961 to avail the benefit of ‘no penalty’ under [LexDoc Id : 321245]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
Times Publishing House Ltd. vs Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks and Ors.
Cancellation of registration of Trademark-Inclusion of necessary parties-The applicant was impleaded in the writ petition, which was filed for cancelling the registration of the applicant’s mark 'Financial Times' because th [LexDoc Id : 318335]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Suptd. of Post Offices and Ors. vs R. Valasina Babu
[LexDoc Id : 316272]
|
SC |
2006 |
CIT vs Meenakshi Narayanan Investments (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 309811]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
Sahara India (Firm) vs CIT and Anr.
Validity of special audit-Opportunity to assessee-The question whether, prior to ordering the assessee to get a special audit done under s.142(2A) of the Income Tax Act 1961 it was necessary to give t [LexDoc Id : 305879]
|
SC |
2006 |
Shanti Devi vs Daropti Devi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 305823]
|
SC |
2006 |
S.A. Builders Ltd. vs CIT and Anr.
Deduction: Interest on borrowed capital-Interest free advance to sister concern-AY 1990-91, 1991-92. The assessee had borrowed funds on interest and advanced interest free advances to its sister concern, which was its subsidiary, [LexDoc Id : 305821]
|
SC |
2006 |
P.P. Abdulla and Anr. vs The Competent Authority and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 305792]
|
SC |
2006 |
Murari Thakur and Anr. vs State of Bihar
[LexDoc Id : 305791]
|
SC |
2006 |
Morgan Securities and Credit (P) Ltd. vs Modi Rubber Ltd.
Provisions of SICA 1985-Existence of non-obstante clause-An appeal under SICA 1985 to BIFR against permission granted by High court to borrower-respondent company to dispose off certain shares of the company [LexDoc Id : 305790]
|
SC |
2006 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|